Villa Stats Attack – Which Villa Players are Pulling Their Weight According to the Figures

Do the numbers back up what we’re seeing on the pitch?

After this week examining Villa’s best midfield trio and comparing this season’s results with last season of the teams played so far, it’s time for a statistical comparison. In short, the following questions will be answered: a) which players stand out this season and b) how the team’s stats compare with last season. Sometime that can be a little overkill on the use of stats, but with a few Villa stats here we hope to provide a little insight into what is actually happening on the field [It’s a 2-page article].

Possession and passing

Top 3 passers (minimum 2 starts): Okore (88%), Vlaar (86%), Luna (85%).

Worst 3 passers (minimum 2 starts, excluding Guzan). Benteke (60%), Weimann (74%), Agbonlahor (75%).

Here, the passing accuracies have been expressed using our most common starting XI:

Now, this would somewhat support what we’ve seen on the pitch. Villa have primarily been a counter-attacking team. Although I feel that pundits have made too much of this (we were more of a counter-attacking team under Martin O’Neill, I feel), our greatest success this season has been because of our ability to sit back, soak possession up and then break. Even at Norwich, we only had 36% of possession. This shows with the passing statistics: Villa have strong passing stats at the back (Okore has the best passing stats of all players this season), very good percentages in the middle, and poor passing stats going forward. Given that Villa don’t spend lots of time keeping the ball in the opposition half, and instead look to play a quick ball into the wings or a ball up to Benteke, these percentages aren’t too surprising.

One surprise is perhaps Westwood – he has been criticised for his inability to pass the ball forwards and instead passes sideways and backwards – yet his pass success is worse than KEA and only slightly better than Delph, who has been breaking forward and trying to create chances. For me, Westwood is Man United’s Carrick equivalent – his passing success is up at 84%. I’d like to see Westwood try more forward balls like Carrick as last season showed Westwood’s ability to grab assists with through balls. Guzan’s passing at 47% looks poor, but for a keeper this is reasonable – Mignolet at Liverpool (who play out from the back, is on 44% for example.

As a team, we’ve had 41% possession this season (compared with 45% last season). Comparatively, this is the worst out of all teams in the league.  Is this down to more counter-attacking player, hard games, or both? I’d certainly expect a bit higher with 3 central midfielders.

Going forward

Top 3 number of ‘key passes’ per game: Benteke (2.2), Agbonlahor (2.2), Lowton (1.3).

Top 3 number of ‘successful dribbles’ per game: Delph (2.8), Agbonlahor (1.6), Benteke (0.8).

Top 3 most fouled players (fouls per game): Delph (3.2), Benteke (1.8), Agbonlahor (1.6).

Top 3 most shots per game: Weimann (2.6), Benteke (2.2), Bacuna (1.3).

So, a part explanation for the lower % pass success for Benteke, Agbonlahor and Lowton could be that they are trying (and succeeding) in creating chances via key passes. Lowton created 21 chances last season (0.55 a game) and has created 4 this season (1 a game). However, his improvement in creating chances came in the latter months of last season – so this season’s chance creation is arguably below par given his end of season performances and chance creation (he managed all of his 4 assists last season and a goal in the final months). Particularly with 3 central midfielders and Weimann enjoying coming inside on the right, Lowton could perhaps offer more.

Delph shows up well here – despite being an attacking midfielder at times, he has a high pass success rate, a high dribble success rate and is fouled a lot (due to being a decent dribbler!). His stats fully support his excellent form.

The top shot takers is surprising. Weimann (2.6) vs. Agbonlahor (1) shows that Weimann is taking almost 3x the number of shots as Agbonlahor. Agbonlahor, from the stats, is more of a creator than a scorer of goals. Even though Agbonlahor played centrally vs. Norwich, he didn’t have a single goal attempt. Furthermore, with Weimann unable to score (despite being an obvious goal threat), I can see a reliance on Kozak for goals until Benteke is back.

‘Big chances’ created (as a team, per game): 1.6 – 2012/13. 2 – 2013/14.

Total shots per game: 11.53 – 2012/13. 12 –2013/14.

On average, Villa have created more ‘big chances’ and had more shots per game than on average last season. Interestingly, our games this season have been against teams with good defences (bar Newcastle (H)). [PAGE 2]


  1. lil_wizard123 ChrisJosephHeathy My Twitter name is Heathy_25, already following you if you want to give me a follow back 🙂

  2. ChrisJosephHeathy Thanks! Most of them I get from a Fantasy Football Scout membership (it costs unfortunately) but they use OPTA. For possession stats/passes I used whoscored. If you’re on Twitter I can send you some more detailed links if you want them.

  3. Quality read, some very precise and well researched stats into how Villa have done so far this season. Delph has easily been the stand-out player of the bunch so far.

Comments are closed.