Aston Villa’s Main Concern for the Start of the Season May Trigger Transfer

Striker Deja Vu

The line-up against Dynamo Dresden this weekend posed a familiar start of the season problem for Steve Bruce – namely a lack of fit strikers. Last year in the season opener against Hull City, the Villa boss elected to play Gabby Agbonlahor out of desperation.

With a match against Hull City again opening the season (albeit away this time), once again Ross McCormack is persona non grata, Scot Hogan is sidelined and Jonathan Kodjia also could again be potentially missing.

Kodjia was left behind from Villa’s short trip to Germany, but it’s hoped with the extra couple of days rest that Villa’s Monday opener against Hull affords, that he will at least be fit.

Keinan Davis and Rushian Hepburn-Murphy, who would have been delighted at getting a chance, have both been recently hampered by recurring injuries and remain on the sidelines.

So what of Scott Hogan, who has missed the entire pre-season?

Going back to January 2017, MOMS repeatedly voiced concerns (both on the site and podcast) over Hogan’s previous poor injury record and asked whether paying circa £10m for a potential ‘sick note’ was wise business?

So far, it hasn’t been and the club haven’t issued a likely return date for the former Brentford striker.

Villa have had a pretty poor return on circa £40m worth of strikers they bought in to fire them to promotion. It has to be remembered that last season loanee Lewis Grabban, who recently signed for Nottingham Forest, was Bruce’s recognised first choice striker even when Kodjia and Hogan were fit.

Embed from Getty Images

Loan Solution?

Maybe another loan can offer Villa hope and jump to the top of the tree of Villa’s striking options?

According to John Percy of the Daily Telegraph, Villa are in the ‘box seat’ against several other Championship teams to enlist the services on a season-long loan of Liverpool’s Ben Woodburn.

The 18-year-old Welsh attacker has carried the tag of ‘teen wonder’ and was impressive against Manchester United in Liverpool’s recent 4-1 stateside friendly win. The youngster had a difficult 2017/18 season, but Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp remarked after beating the Mancs that Woodburn is “100 percent back”.

If the loan is on, then it’s something that should be wrapped up at the beginning of next week you’d think, with reports of the player having already left Liverpool’s training camp.


my old man said facebook



  1. It seems like Bruce is to continue his failed policies of last year. More young loanees to develope for other clubs at our cost! That’s if they are successful. Only Johnson was a success after 2 seasons, leaving our promising young kids wondering why the hell they are here. Considering only 1 of Bruce’s 9 signings, Hourihane, is first choice I’m not a fan of his player choice or maybe it’s just his inability to manage them. Johnson should have been signed 18 month ago. Lansbury and Bjarason should be a better bet than Woodburn. Would Henry be able to get McCormack to play. Well over 100 goals at a rate better than a goal in 3 for his previous 3 clubs! Play so someone gets balls in the box for the isolated short Hogan instead of looping long high balls to the opposition defenders. The squad should still be more than strong enough to mount a promotion challenge. But is Bruce the right man? Not unless he learns from some dreadful mistakes that have left our famous club on its knees. I hope Bruce and the owners read these pages so they can see what is obvious to the rest of us.

  2. I think a good addition but wouldn’t want it to be at the expense of Green or any of our own youth players, Teed off with the Grealish saga false news etc, can someone please ask Jack to say publicly where he wants to be and then we can dispense with all of the media / journalist speculation, if he wants to stay that’s an end to it, if he wants to go and Levy is prepared to pay the full valuation so be it, at least we will know where we stand.

Comments are closed.